ONLINE
L0
← Back to Blog

Spec → Ship: A Practical Workflow for Building With AI Coding Agents

A repeatable, engineering-first workflow for turning fuzzy ideas into shipped software — using AI agents without sacrificing quality.

Spec → Ship: A Practical Workflow for Building With AI Coding Agents

AI coding agents are great at producing output. The real challenge is producing outcomes: software that is correct, secure, and maintainable.

This is the workflow I use to get reliable results.

1) Start with constraints, not features

Before anything else, define:

  • Audience (who is this for?)
  • Success metrics (what improves?)
  • Non-goals (what’s explicitly out of scope?)
  • Risks (security, data integrity, performance, privacy)

Constraints reduce wasted effort and prevent “AI-driven scope creep.”

2) Make “done” testable

A good spec makes acceptance obvious. Examples:

  • “Admin routes require authenticated admin users.”
  • “Published content is visible publicly; drafts are not.”
  • “Build succeeds even when optional env vars are missing.”
  • “RSS and sitemap are generated.”

If you can’t tell whether it’s done, it’s not scoped.

3) Slice the work into verifiable increments

The agent should ship in small chunks:

  • one route,
  • one CRUD surface,
  • one policy layer,
  • one data fetch path.

Each slice should end with: it compiles, it runs, it matches the spec.

4) Put security rules where mistakes are hardest

Two principles:

  • Enforce permissions close to the data (e.g., row-level security).
  • Keep server-only secrets server-only (never in client bundles).

Even if your UI is “correct,” assume it can be bypassed.

5) Prefer boring architecture

When in doubt:

  • a clear table schema over “flexible JSON everywhere”
  • explicit server actions over complex client state
  • readable code over clever abstractions

Boring systems are easier to secure and maintain.

6) Add a “verification loop” to every change

A reliable loop looks like:

  • compile/build check
  • a quick click-path sanity check (the happy path)
  • at least one failure-mode check (unauthorized, missing data, empty state)

If you only test happy paths, production will test the rest.

7) Capture the decisions

The highest-leverage output isn’t code—it’s why the code is this way. Keep short notes:

  • what tradeoff you made
  • why you chose it
  • what you’d revisit later

That becomes your roadmap.


If you’re building with AI agents and want fewer surprises, this workflow is a strong default. If you want help applying it to your product, reach out via Contact.